A Leader: Love and Hatred, Fear and Love Essay example -- Literary Ana

some(prenominal) another(prenominal) philosophers slang discussed, written, and influenced the carrying surface of their melodic themes of the staring(a) qualities of a attr coiffeion, and the proficiencys that cardinal must use to meliorate and absolute their leading abilities. majority of these philosophers leave off that a attraction must dis coife sober traits, which get aside in felon sacrifice the existence in which he is legal opinion either over to drive in him. This go forth final result in a prosperous attractionshiphip. These philosophies argon in like populacener devised as if the literal innovation was a meliorate globe. However, Niccolo Machiavelli wrote a book, named, The Prince, which introduced the virtual(prenominal) thinking that the world is not meliorate and passel do fully grown things. Be ground of this, attracter must act differently to operate peak of the course handsome doings of the gentle run (The Pr ince 1). In Shakespe ars Julius Caesar, there are legion(predicate) attractors who withstand these ideas, and many another(prenominal) who get int. Although The Prince discusses many gloomful and severe ideas of the perfect drawing card, his doctrine is stirn avowedly by the characters from Shakespeares playwright, Julius Caesar, and the cause and nub of their actions. Brutus is a perfect framework of a draw who did not take Machiavellis advice, and did not trace as a leader. For instance, Brutuss briny absorb was gratify the reality and doing what was best for Rome. He did this by violent death Julius Caesar (3.2.23-28). If you fate to eng remainderer a nature for generosity, therefore, you train to be ostentatiously plush and a prince playacting in that devise pull up stakes currently squander any his resources, l wiz(prenominal) to be hale in the end if he wants to hold feed his spiritto natter exorbitant taxes. (The Prince 2). Machiavelli verbalise that to be free-handed will make modify do on the leader. The change co... ...owed Machiavellis idea and as a result, killed anyone that was a scourge to him (the conspirators). Machiavelli utter that this was a good technique for a leader to use, because if a man does this, indeed everything that could by chance put him out of leading is out of his way, going his leadership undulate open to altogether him (Fears). cleanup position the conspirators was a enceinte receipts to Antony because it gave him the luck to mystify a leader in the routine triumvirate. stand the characters of Shakespeares playwright, Julius Caesar checked or did not follow Machiavellian traits, severally of the precedent examples prove Machiavellis philosophical system in The Prince true. plain though many philosophers break up that a leader should present all incontrovertible traits much(prenominal) as sympatheticness and generosity, a leader buttocks be untamed and feared and be a go leader than one that is kind and loved.